So the following represents only a snapshot in time - your mileage will vary, with different users almost certainly receiving different answers.īut the comparison does give a general idea of how each bot works, with Bard being more of a "just-the-facts" conversational partner, while Bing is more chatty and friendly, in an AI sort of way (at least using the "More Balanced" option, as opposed to "More Creative" and "More Precise"). Note that both bots provide different answers to the same questions on different days, or even to the same question immediately asked again. While neither LLM has been optimized for coding (like OpenAI's Codex, which powers GitHub Copilot), both can generate code, producing nearly identical results when asked to generate a C# bubble sort function (admittedly the most basic of examples): While Bard was just made available yesterday, the new Bing was announced some six weeks earlier.īoth machine language constructs use cutting-edge large language models (LLM), GPT-4 for Bing, created by Microsoft partner OpenAI (creator of ChatGPT), and the homegrown LaMDA (Language Model for Dialogue Applications) for Bard. Note that, at this stage, it's a bit of an apples-to-oranges comparison, as Google was slightly later to the game and heavily emphasizes the "experiment" focus of the release, designed to help the company solicit feedback and iteratively improve the experience. With Google recently releasing a generative AI-powered search bot called Bard to rival Microsoft's "new Bing" search experience, we put both to the test, feeding them identical questions about Visual Studio and.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |